The story begins:By bare majorities, Californians reject the state Supreme Court’s decision to allow same-sex marriages and back a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at the November ballot that would outlaw such unions, a Los Angeles Times/KTLA Poll has found.
...
Wow. With language like “slimly reject,” “narrowly reject,” “small margin,” and “bare majorities,” this sounds like a real photo finish. Let’s look at the body of the story, to see how narrowly the anti-gay marriage forces are barely squeaking past the opposition.
It turns out that the proposed amendment to ban gay marriage is “was leading 54% to 35% among registered voters.”
Jeez. Only a 19-point difference! That’s certainly a “small margin”! You can’t reject gay marriage more “narrowly” than that!
I think they mean that Californians, who are slim, are rejecting gay marriage by a large margin. Hence, slimly rejecting!
And how did the L.A. Times report Obama's 18 point victory in Oregon?
Obama's big win in Oregon
Oh, I see.
No comments:
Post a Comment